What does Luke 20:19 mean?
Explanation
Luke 20:19 discusses the immediate reaction of the chief priests and scribes after Jesus told a parable that they understood was directed against them.
In the narrative, the religious authorities want to arrest Jesus (lay hands on him) because they recognize that he is critiquing their behavior and teaching.
Their intention to seize him is checked by their fear of the public, whom they perceive as being sympathetic to Jesus.
This verse highlights the tension between Jesus and the Jewish religious leaders, which is a recurring theme in the Gospels.
Top Rated Luke Books
Historical Context
The verse occurs during the week leading up to Jesus' crucifixion, a period commonly known as Passion Week. This timeframe is marked by escalating conflict between Jesus and the Jewish religious authorities.
The setting is the Jerusalem Temple where Jesus is teaching during one of the major Jewish festivals, possibly the Feast of Tabernacles or Passover.
At this time, the tension between Jesus and the religious leaders is at a climax.
The temple was not just a place of worship but a center of Jewish national and political life.
Theological Insights
Theologically, the response of the religious leaders highlights the biblical theme of human resistance to divine messages that challenge entrenched power structures.
From a Christian viewpoint, Jesus is seen as the truth-teller who unmasks the hypocrisy of those in religious power, fulfilling Old Testament prophecies of a Messiah who would establish justice.
The scribes and chief priests represent the resistance of the old order to the new kingdom being ushered in by Christ.
Practical Applications
This verse reminds believers of the potential cost of discipleship, which may include misunderstanding, opposition, or hostility from those resisting change or feeling threatened.
It also emphasizes the importance of aligning oneself with truth, even when that truth is unpopular.
Followers of Jesus might draw inspiration from his courage in speaking out against corruption and injustice.
Cross-References
- Matthew 21:45-46 - "And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them."
- Mark 12:12 - "And they sought to lay hold on him, but feared the people: for they knew that he had spoken the parable against them: and they left him, and went their way."
- John 7:30 - "Then they sought to take him: but no man laid hands on him, because his hour was not yet come."
- Isaiah 53:3 - "He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not."
Language Study
In the original Greek text, the verb "εἰδότες" (eidotes), translated as "perceived," carries a sense of knowing or recognizing, which conveys that the chief priests and scribes had no doubt about whom the parable was directed.
The phrase "to lay hands on him" translates from "ἐπιβαλεῖν τὰς χεῖρας" (epibalein tas cheiras), which means to seize or to arrest with force, suggesting a hostile intention.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The antagonism between a spiritual leader and the established religious authorities can be found in many religious traditions.
For instance, in Hinduism, reformers like Buddha also faced resistance from the Vedic priests of their time.
Similarly, in Islam, Prophet Muhammad faced opposition from the leaders of Mecca when he started to preach his revelations.
Scientific Perspectives
This verse speaks to the psychological and sociological dynamics of power and influence rather than addressing natural scientific principles.
However, modern social science might look at this incident as an example of how established structures react to challenges against their authority, often with attempts to silence dissent.
Commentaries
Commentators often point out the escalating conflict in narratives like Luke 20:19.
Some focus on the political and social dimensions of the conflict, emphasizing the power struggle and fear of the religious leaders.
Others interpret the verse Christologically, seeing it as a step on the path to the crucifixion and a testament to Jesus' fulfillment of his messianic role as described in the Hebrew Scriptures.
There is typically an agreement that this verse exhibits the deliberate choices of Jesus to confront corrupt religious systems and the fear-induced reactions of those systems to maintain control.