What does Matthew 16:15 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 16:15 is a critical verse in the New Testament, where Jesus directly questions His disciples about their personal belief regarding His identity.
Jesus asks, "But whom say ye that I am?" This question follows a previous discussion about the various opinions of the public, who believed Jesus to be a prophet like John the Baptist, Elijah, Jeremiah, or another of the prophets.
However, Jesus moves from the general opinions of the masses to the personal conviction of His closest followers. His question is probing and meant to challenge the disciples to acknowledge the revelation they have received concerning His divine nature.
This verse captures a moment of potential revelation and confession from the disciples.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
The verse is set in the region of Caesarea Philippi, a Greco-Roman city that Herod Philip II named after himself and the emperor Caesar Augustus.
At the time of Jesus' ministry, this region was known for its religious diversity, with temples dedicated to various gods, including the worship of the Roman Emperor.
Jesus' question to His disciples in this location is significant, as they stood amidst a backdrop of pagan worship and claims of divine emperorship.
It was here that Jesus sought to clarify His distinct identity and mission, separate from the prevailing religious and political expectations of a Messiah.
Theological Insights
From a theological standpoint, Matthew 16:15 has been a significant verse in formulating Christology, the doctrine of the nature and person of Jesus Christ:
- Orthodox Christian Viewpoint: Jesus is not merely a prophet but is Himself divine.
This verse leads up to Peter's confession of Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God, affirming the divine revelation given to the apostles.
-
Catholic Perspective: This verse, along with Peter's subsequent confession, has been historically linked to the doctrine of papal primacy, the pope being Peter's successor as a spiritual leader.
-
Protestant Interpretation: The emphasis is often on the personal relationship and recognition of Jesus as Lord and Savior, stemming from an individual's revelation rather than church tradition or authority.
Each of these viewpoints seeks to grapple with the true identity of Jesus and acknowledge His unique role in salvation history.
Practical Applications
Matthew 16:15 challenges individuals to consider their own answer to Jesus' question. It encourages personal reflection on who Jesus is and fosters a commitment to follow Him based on personal conviction.
-
Identity of Christ: Followers of Jesus today are implored to wrestle with His identity and come to a personal understanding and relationship with Him.
-
Confession and Witness: The verse inspires believers to openly confess their faith in Jesus in a world that may have diverse or contradictory views about Him.
-
Spiritual Reflection: It serves as a call for continual spiritual reflection on the nature of one's faith and depth of understanding of Jesus.
Cross-References
- Matthew 16:16 - "And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God."
- Mark 8:29 - "And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Peter answereth and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ."
- Luke 9:20 - "He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The Christ of God."
- John 6:67-69 - "Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.
And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God."
Language Study
The key words in the original Greek text of Matthew 16:15 that are of particular interest are:
"Ye" (Greek "ὑμεῖς", transliterated "humeis") is plural, indicating that Jesus is addressing all His disciples, soliciting a corporate response to His identity.
"Say" (Greek "λέγετε", transliterated "legete") is in the present active indicative, pointing to the current and ongoing opinion or confession of the disciples.
"I" (Greek "ἐγώ", transliterated "egō") emphasizes Jesus Himself as the subject of the question, distinguishing His identity from the other names previously discussed.
"Am" (Greek "εἰμί", transliterated "eimi") is in the present tense, indicating the current and continuous state of being, which in theological terms points to the divine name revealed to Moses in Exodus 3:14, "I AM WHO I AM."
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In comparison to other ancient myths and religious interpretations, Jesus' question about His identity sets Him apart from the mythological figures of the time.
Unlike mythical gods or heroes, Jesus' identity and mission were rooted in historical reality, and His divinity was connected to a monotheistic framework distinct from the polytheistic environment.
-
Messianic Expectations: Contrast with Jewish expectations of a political Messiah who would overthrow Roman rule, Jesus' identity as laid out in the following verses reveals a spiritual redemption rather than a political one.
-
Pagan Divinity Claims: Compared to the divine claims of emperors or god-kings in the surrounding culture, Jesus' divine claim is not tied to military power or royal lineage.
Scientific Perspectives
While Matthew 16:15 is primarily theological and spiritual in nature and thus not directly related to scientific investigation, contemporary scientific perspectives on cognition and belief formation can lend insight into how individuals might process questions of identity and belief in the divine.
-
Psychology of Belief: Cognitive science studies how personal beliefs and revelations impact individual actions and community behavior.
-
Historical Archaeology: Archaeology contributes to understanding the historical context in which Jesus lived and how His teachings compared with contemporary religious and philosophical ideas.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars and theologians have commented on Matthew 16:15 over the centuries, providing rich insight into its meaning:
-
John Calvin: Emphasized the necessity of divine revelation for the disciples to truly understand and confess the identity of Jesus.
-
William Barclay: Suggested the essential distinction between knowledge about Jesus based on popular opinion and the personal conviction revealed by God to individuals.
-
Craig S. Keener: In his commentary, focuses on the contrast between popular messianic expectations of the time and the true nature of Jesus' messiahship.
Each commentary aids in unpacking the different dimensions of Jesus' profound question and its implications for faith and Christian doctrine.