What does Matthew 27:22 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 27:22 depicts a critical moment during the trial of Jesus Christ before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea.
Pilate, facing a crowd that has been incited by the chief priests and elders, asks them what he should do with Jesus, whom they call Christ.
The response from the crowd, "Let him be crucified," reflects their desire for the death penalty, a sentence that crucifixion implies.
On a literal level, this verse shows the crowd's choice, possibly influenced by their leaders, for the most severe and humiliating form of Roman execution.
On a deeper level, this verse can evoke themes of injustice, mob mentality, the fulfillment of prophecies regarding the Messiah, and the acceptance of a destined path that leads to the crucifixion of Jesus, which is central to Christian soteriology, the doctrine of salvation.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
This verse is set within the context of Passover, a pivotal Jewish festival commemorating the Exodus from Egypt, which brought large numbers of Jews to Jerusalem.
During this period, it was customary for the Roman governor to release a prisoner of the people's choice.
The political climate was tense, with Roman authority often clashing with Jewish religious leaders and the general populace.
Jesus had been arrested and brought before Pilate after being accused by the Jewish authorities of various charges, including claims of being the King of the Jews, a title with political repercussions.
Historically, Pilate's actual inclination was to release Jesus, as he found no fault in him, yet the crowds were persuaded to choose the release of Barabbas, a known criminal, over Jesus.
Theological Insights
From a Christian theological perspective, the verse signifies the will of God being carried out through the actions of human beings, even when they act unjustly.
It's an instance where human and divine agencies intersect, reflecting key Christian beliefs about the preordained sacrifice of Jesus for the redemption of humanity's sins.
This event has been interpreted as a necessary step in salvation history, where Jesus' death would become the atonement for all, representing the ultimate display of God's love and justice.
Practical Applications
Matthew 27:22 can remind individuals of the importance of discerning what is just and standing up for it, rather than capitulating to popular opinion.
It may serve as a warning against the dangers of crowd mentality and the ease with which people can be influenced to make decisions that cater to the lowest common denominator, rather than making moral and ethical choices.
In daily life, one can apply this lesson by striving to remain true to one's convictions, even under pressure from the majority.
Cross-References
- John 19:15: "But they cried out, Away with [him], away with [him], crucify him.
Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar."
- Mark 15:13-14: "And they cried out again, Crucify him.
Then Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done? And they cried out the more exceedingly, Crucify him."
- Luke 23:21: "But they shouted, saying, Crucify [him], crucify him."
Language Study
The key words in the original Greek text from this verse are "Τί οὖν ποιήσω Ἰησοῦν τὸν λεγόμενον Χριστόν;" (Ti oun poiēsō Iēsoun ton legomenon Christon?), which is literally translated as, "What then shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?" The term "Χριστόν" (Christos) translates to "the Anointed One," signifying the Messiah.
The verb "ποιήσω" (poiēsō) implies action, what one should do or make, with a connotation of destiny or decree in this context.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The call for the crucifixion of Jesus can be compared to other religious narratives where a central figure is sacrificed or suffers for the sake of a greater good.
For instance, in some interpretations of the Pagan myth of the dying and resurrecting god (like Osiris), there are parallels to the notion of a divine figure facing death to facilitate a transformation or redemption.
While these comparisons exist, they are typically used in comparative religion and not necessarily accepted within mainstream Christian doctrinal teachings.
Scientific Perspectives
From a scientific perspective, the method of crucifixion was a common Roman punishment, particularly for slaves and individuals deemed the most dangerous to the state.
It was designed to produce a slow and painful death with maximum humiliation.
While the passage does not offer scientific content for analysis, archeology and forensic science have provided insights into the brutal nature of crucifixion as a form of ancient execution.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars and theologians have provided insights on Matthew 27:22.
Some focus on the historical reliability of Pilate's character as a governor who wished to avoid unnecessary trouble, thus being subject to popular opinion.
Others emphasize the prophetic fulfillment aspect of this scene, where the call for crucifixion is seen as the unfolding of divine prophecy regarding the Messiah's suffering.
There are also discussions about the socio-political dynamics at play between Pilate, the Jewish authorities, and the people, shedding light on the tensions and complexities of governance and religious leadership during that period.