What does Matthew 27:9 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 27:9 refers to a prophecy that is fulfilled through the events surrounding the betrayal of Jesus Christ.
Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve disciples, agreed to betray Jesus to the chief priests for thirty pieces of silver.
After Jesus was arrested, Judas felt remorse and returned the money to the priests, but they refused to put it back in the treasury, deeming it "blood money." They then used it to buy a potter's field as a burial place for foreigners, this purchase and the price of the thirty pieces of silver are seen as the fulfillment of a prophecy.
The verse is intriguing because it attributes the prophecy to Jeremiah, whereas the details of this event more closely align with Zechariah 11:12-13. This discrepancy has been the subject of much discussion.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
The Gospel of Matthew was likely written in the late first century for a predominantly Jewish audience.
Matthew often references Hebrew scriptures to connect the story of Jesus with Jewish prophecy, reinforcing the belief that Jesus is the Messiah foretold in Jewish texts.
The thirty pieces of silver and their use to buy a potter's field would have been a symbolic act fully rooted in the social and religious context of the time.
Theological Insights
Numerous theological interpretations exist for this verse.
Some see this act as a sign of divine providence, God's plan unfolding through human actions.
Others interpret the treachery of Judas as integral to the fulfillment of the messianic prophecy, demonstrating that even acts of betrayal are within God's sovereign will.
The discrepancy with the reference to Jeremiah has been viewed in several ways, including as a composite quotation, a citation error, or a deeper typological connection between Jeremiah's and Zechariah's prophecies.
Practical Applications
In practical terms, this verse cautions against betrayal and greed, serving as a moral lesson about the consequences of valuing money over loyalty or righteousness.
It can also teach the importance of understanding that actions have consequences, and sometimes these consequences are larger and more far-reaching than one can anticipate.
Cross-References
- Zechariah 11:12-13: "And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear.
So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver.
And the LORD said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them.
And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the LORD."
- Exodus 21:32: "If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant; he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned."
- Jeremiah 19:1-13: Discusses the purchase of a potter's field and a prophecy concerning the destruction that would come upon Jerusalem, possibly providing background for the typology seen in Matthew's gospel.
Language Study
The key term in this passage is "thirty pieces of silver" (Greek: τριάκοντα ἀργύρια), which refers to the amount of money Judas received for betraying Jesus.
This exact sum holds specific significance as it was the price of a slave in ancient times (Exodus 21:32).
The use of this term would have resonated with Matthew’s Jewish audience, providing a direct link to the scriptures and laws they held sacred.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The tale of betrayal for silver can be compared to various myths where betrayal leads to undesirable outcomes, reinforcing the theme that betrayal against divine figures results in divine justice.
The use of silver, a common currency, as the price for betrayal, is a motif that bridges cultural narratives from many religious and mythological stories.
Scientific Perspectives
The study of ancient coins, numismatics, can provide insight into the historical context of the "thirty pieces of silver." Scientific analysis can determine the composition and origin of such coins, shedding light on the economic conditions of the time.
Psychology offers perspectives on Judas's behavior, exploring what could motivate betrayal and how individuals reconcile with guilt.
Commentaries
Many biblical commentaries debate the precise meaning of this prophecy and Matthew's attribution to Jeremiah.
Some experts argue that Matthew is drawing on themes from Jeremiah and Zechariah to demonstrate the prophetic background of Jesus' life.
Others suggest that Matthew may have quoted oral tradition or a non-extant written source that ascribed this prophecy to Jeremiah.
They also explore the theological implications of the passage, emphasizing God's sovereignty and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy in the New Testament narrative.